Use On Review

7-K-04-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the development plan for up to 296 detached single-family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved concept subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zoning district and the general criteria for approval of a use on review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
Southwest side of Solway Rd., southeast side of Sam Lee Rd.

Commission District 6


Size
172.73 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for up to 296 detached single-family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved concept subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zoning district and the general criteria for approval of a use on review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the development plan for up to 296 detached single-family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved concept subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zoning district and the general criteria for approval of a use on review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - September 11, 2004 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Smith - Campbell Joint Venture


Case History