Use On Review

4-I-05-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the development plan for up to 51 detached single family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved Concept Subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a use on review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 Kimberlin Heights Rd

Southeast side of Kimberlin Heights Rd., at the south end of Old French Rd.

Commission District 9


Size
25.91 acres

Sector
South County

Land Use Designation? AG/RR


Growth Plan
Rural Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for up to 51 detached single family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved Concept Subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a use on review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the development plan for up to 51 detached single family dwellings on individual lots subject to 2 conditions.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the approved Concept Subdivision plan.
2. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a use on review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - May 14, 2005 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Smith Contracting, LLC


Case History