Use On Review

11-K-01-UR

Recommended for denial
by the Planning Commission

Deny the development plan


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
The Planning Commission's denial was based on the following findings:

1. The tower would devalue an adjacent 60-acre site planned for use as a subdivision by the owner.
2. A 195-foot tower is visually obtrusive in this location.
3. A system of more frequent, lower towers would provide adequate service and have less impact on the landscape.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
0 N Campbell Station Rd

Southeast side of N. Campbell Station Rd., northeast of El Rancho Trail

Commission District 6


Size
18.50 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Currently on the Property
Vacant land

Growth Plan
Rural Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for a 195 foot monopole telecommunications tower subject to 6 conditions.
1) Installing the proposed landscaping as shown on the landscape plan, within six months of the tower becoming operational, or posting a bond with the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works to guarantee such installation.
2) Since the FAA does not require any lighting for this facility, there shall be no lighting on the tower.
3) At the time of the request for a building permit, posting a bond or other approved financial surety that would ensure the removal of the tower if it is abandoned.
4) Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.
5) Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Department of Engineering and Public Works.
6) A revised site plan, reflecting the conditions of approval must be submitted to MPC staff prior to issuance of any building permits for the project.

With the conditions noted, the request meets all requirements for approval of a use-on-review.
Disposition Summary
Deny the development plan
Details of Action
The Planning Commission's denial was based on the following findings:

1. The tower would devalue an adjacent 60-acre site planned for use as a subdivision by the owner.
2. A 195-foot tower is visually obtrusive in this location.
3. A system of more frequent, lower towers would provide adequate service and have less impact on the landscape.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - May 11, 2002 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Crown Communications, Inc. and Cingular Wireless, LLP


Case History