Use On Review

10-E-15-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 101 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', subject to 1 condition.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
9957 Dutchtown Rd

North side of Dutchtown Rd, south side of Bob Gray Rd.

Commission District 3
Census Tract 46.11


Size
24.62 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR


Currently on the Property
Residence and vacant land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 101 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', subject to 1 condition.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 101 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', subject to 1 condition.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - December 12, 2015 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Green River Holdings, LLC


Case History