Use On Review

1-E-16-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the request for up to 126 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', except along the project frontage on Lovell Rd. subject to 1 condition.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
Southeast side of Lovell Rd., southeast of Thompson Rd.

Commission District 6


Size
38.08 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR (Low Density Residential)


Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the request for up to 126 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', except along the project frontage on Lovell Rd. subject to 1 condition.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the request for up to 126 detached dwelling units on individual lots, and the requested reduction of the peripheral setback from 35' to 25', except along the project frontage on Lovell Rd. subject to 1 condition.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a Use on Review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - April 9, 2016 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Rufus H. Smith


Case History