Use On Review

7-F-18-UR

Recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 70 detached dwelling on individual lots and a 25' peripheral setback for lots 1-23, 26 & 27, subject to 1 condition.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a concept plan and use-on-review.

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
7121 Ball Rd

North side of Ball Rd., east of Madeline Vine Ln.

Commission District 6
Census Tract 60.01


Size
27.40 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR (Low Density Residential)


Currently on the Property
Rural residential & vacant land

Growth Plan
Planned Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 70 detached dwelling on individual lots and a 25' peripheral setback for lots 1-23, 26 & 27, subject to 1 condition.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a concept plan and use-on-review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the Development Plan for up to 70 detached dwelling on individual lots and a 25' peripheral setback for lots 1-23, 26 & 27, subject to 1 condition.
Details of Action
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a concept plan and use-on-review.

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - August 11, 2018 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Worley Builders, Inc.


Case History