Use On Review

5-J-18-UR

Approved as modified
by the Planning Commission

APPROVE the development plan for up to 121 detached residential dwellings on individual lots and approve reduction of peripheral boundary from 35 feet to 25 feet as requested , subject to 1 condition.


See case notes below

Details

Request

Property Info

Case Notes

What's next?

Details of Action

+
APPROVE the development plan for up to 121 detached residential dwellings on individual lots and approve reduction of peripheral boundary from 35 feet to 25 feet as requested , subject to 1 condition. (MPC added peripheral boundary reduction 5-10-18)

Applicant Request

+

Property Information

+
Location
905 Fretz Rd

West side of Fretz Rd., north side of Hatmaker Ln

Commission District 6
Census Tract 59.04


Size
32.70 acres

Sector
Northwest County

Land Use Designation? LDR


Currently on the Property
Vacant land

Growth Plan
Urban Growth Area

Case Notes

+
Staff Recommendation
APPROVE the development plan for up to 121 detached residential dwellings on individual lots, subject to 1 condition.
1. Meeting all applicable requirements of the Knox County Zoning Ordinance.

With the conditions noted, this plan meets the requirements for approval in the PR zone and the other criteria for approval of a concept plan and use-on-review.
Disposition Summary
APPROVE the development plan for up to 121 detached residential dwellings on individual lots and approve reduction of peripheral boundary from 35 feet to 25 feet as requested , subject to 1 condition.
Details of Action
APPROVE the development plan for up to 121 detached residential dwellings on individual lots and approve reduction of peripheral boundary from 35 feet to 25 feet as requested , subject to 1 condition. (MPC added peripheral boundary reduction 5-10-18)

What's next?

+
As a Use On Review case, the Planning Commission's decision is final, and it will not be heard by a legislative body unless it is appealed.

The appeal deadline - June 9, 2018 - has passed.

The Process
Applicant

Mesana Investments, LLC


Case History